The Decision of the Court of Appeals regarding Rosita Trillanes’ Libel Case

IS FELIX MANALO GUILTY BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT ON THE SO-CALLED RAPE CASE AND IMMORAL ACTS?

 THE Judicial Court of any land must not proclaimed a person “guilty of a crime” unless that person is “guilty beyond reasonable doubt.” The court must not base their decision on “rumors” but on “facts.” The Japanese sponsored Court of Appeals declared on 1942 that Brother Felix Y. Manalo was a “man of low morals” and reversed the decision of the lower court (the Court of First Instance of Manila) on the libel case against Rosita Trillanes filed by Brother Felix Y. Manalo. The lower court found Rosita Trillanes “guilty beyond reasonable doubt.”

Did the Japanese sponsored Court of Appeals found Brother Felix Y. Manalo "guilty beyond reasonable doubt” in saying that he is a "man of low morals"? Did they based their decisions on facts? See for yourself:

Arguments Against the Decision of the Japanese Sponsored Court of Appeals regarding Rosita Trillanes' Libel Case

WHEN THE INC DETRACTORS USED THE “DECISION OF THE COURT OF APPEALS REGARDING ROSITA TRILLANES’ LIBEL CASE” IN PROVING THAT BROTHER FELIX Y. MANALO IS GUILTY OF RAPE AND IMMORAL ACTS:

Did Felix Manalo Raped Rosita Trillanes? The full story behind the allegation

  
DID FELIX MANALO RAPED ROSITA TRILLANES?

ATTACKING THE CHARACTER of a person is an act of desperation, because this shows that they cannot refute his teachings that’s why they resort to attacking the person instead of the teachings or doctrines he is preaching. This fallacy is called “argumentum ad hominem.” Yes, it’s an act of desperation and truly a fallacy. However, this is what the detractors of Brother Felix Y. Manalo and the detractors of the Iglesia ni Cristo are doing.

What exposed their real intention is the fact that although they have no concrete evidences, just baseless accusations and allegations, however, they will still use it, publish it, spread it. Many times, concrete evidences were already shown to refute their allegations, but they intentionally and totally ignored them and will continue to spread their baseless allegations and accusations because their intention is not to expose the truth, but to impose a negative impression on the person being attack (“manira lamang”). Thus, it is not surprising that after their allegations were proven false or refuted, they will invent more and more lies against the person they attack.

This is indeed what they are doing against Brother Felix Y. Manalo and the Iglesia Ni Cristo.